Recent comments
Recent posts
Cancer Research UK Science Update Blog
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Psiram/Esowatch
- Das Konzept der absconditen Interpaginalität – eine critical hunt for easter eggs
- Psiram Leaks
- Initiative zur Förderung einer gerechten und sachlichen Debatte
- Wohin steuert die GWUP
- #MetooTantra
- Codex Humanus
- Die Deutschen und der Weltfrieden
- Die Metaphysik des Krebsrisikos
- Unabhängige Experten
- Soziologisches zu Cannabis als Medizin
Respectul Insolence
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Science-Based Medicine
- The Washington Post publishes an advertorial on IV drips
- Dr. Vinay Prasad Pretends to Admit Error: I Was Optimistic That Vaccination Would Halt the Spread of the Virus—I Was Wrong.
- Tattoos Still Won’t Boost Your Immune System
- Binders, fillers and more? What’s all that other stuff in my medicine?
- How To Approach Psychogenic Symptoms
- Dr. Jeffrey Flier: Those Who Express Different Views on Health Equity Should Be Demonized, Not Heard
- A poorly framed article on COVID-19 vaccine injury in the New York Times
- Woke Washing the Pandemic: If You Really Were Progressive, You’d Want Them Infected
- Kava and Liver Damage
- We finally learn from TACT2 what we should have known two decades ago: Chelation therapy doesn’t work for heart disease
Edzard Ernst
- The Effect of Distance Reiki on Anxiety and Test Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- WOW! The German Medical Association bans homeopathy
- Whooping cough is back: please beware of homeopaths, their remedies and their advice!
- Believing in conspiracy theories: The role of emotional granularity and maladaptive emotion regulation
- Health complaints before and after removal of dental amalgam restorations
- Increasing concerns about SCAM research originating from China
- Antibiotic Use in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Practicing Integrative Medicine
- The contribution of 50 years of vaccination: 10·2 billion years of full health gained
- Chiropractic attitude and utilisation of evidence-based practice
- The fake diagnoses of so-called alternative medicine – PART 4
Blogroll
- A pathologist examines: cancer and fungus
- Alternative Medicine and Cancer
- Ars GeriatriCare (Dutch)
- Cancer Research UK
- Cancer Survival in Europe
- Cryptocheilus medical blog (Dutch)
- Dr. Len's Cancer Blog
- EBM-first: What alternative health practitioners might not tell you
- Medbunker blogspot (Italian)
- My Malignant Melanoma
- Psiram/Esowatch (German)
- Quackwatch
- Science-Based Medicine
Top Posts
Categories
acupuncture
alternative cancer treatment
alternative medicine
antisemitic
baking soda
biologie totale
boosting
breast cancer
cam
Cancer
candida
candida albicans
carcinoma
Caroline Markolin
cat scan
chemo
chemotherapy
chief rabbi
chiropractic
claude sabbah
corinne thos
Dirk Hamer
echinacea
evidence
evidence-based medicine
fungus
garlic
Germanische Neue Medizin
German Medicine
German New Medicine
GNM
götz
Hamer
HBOT
Health fraud
holistic
homeopathy
hoxsey therapy
hulda clarck
images
immune system
iscador
iwan götz
jewish conspiracy
libel
manual therapy
medecine nouvelle
meta medicine
metametrix
metastases
Michaeala Jakubczyk
mistletoe
naturopathy
nouvelle medécine
olivia pilhar
osteopathy
personality
Philosophy of science
positive thinking
psychological aspects and cancer
quackery
rife
Ryke Geerd Hamer
santegod
schneerson
science
Simoncini
sodium bicarbonate
supplements
tony isaacs
total biology
Tullio Simoncini
viscum album
vitamins
zapper
I would have to agree that there is no medical miracle here, if the lady got a turbt.
It’s also a positive to see that the conventional treatment was followed and not discouraged. Of course, it’s also always nice to see positive results.
My thoughts on Simonici is he is too simplistic and seems to make alot of mistakes. If dopey’s like me with no medical training can have more information/knowledge on Candida than him, then there’s a problem.
I wouldn’t consider myself a dopey if I were you Rich! 🙂
But we do have a problem. There are many people who know next to nothing about cancer and/or are afraid to be educated on it. These are just the people who fall for stories like Simoncini’s. And more than often, they pay for it with their lives.
This is another good example of what can be wrong with testimonials as evidence of cure. And again Simoncini being a (former) doctor cannot have been unaware of this.
If the TURBT works to cure cancer, why would the Urologist recommend having Immunotherapy?
@ LMO; 2009/07/28 at 10:15am
I have no idea what you mean.
Immunotheapy of bladder neoplasia consists of instillation of “BCG” (Weakened tuberculosis bacteria), which induces an immunologic response, creating an environment that destroy cancer precursors. It is used after TURB if the bladder mucosa is lined with cells that if left unattended can develop into cancer. In short – TURB removes the cancer, and immunotherapy prevents recurrence.
Thank you!
🙂
you guys do come across a bit smug and padlocked…even if you are right in this instance
I have bladder cancer and I have undergone a TURBT, however 60% + people who have a TURBT have to do it again eventually as bladder cancer has a nasty habit of reoccurring. TURBT removes the cancer, it does not cure it.
Cancer is systemic, it just gets a stronger foothold when the milieu is weakened. To say “we got it all”(surgically) or “we destroyed the cancer” (with radiation) when they have only treated that part of the body where the cancer manifested itself is quackery. Butcher, burn and poison has few advances in the last 60 years but has improved its statistics through earlier diagnosis…which starts the timer on their 5 years alive = cured BS.
First of all: I think the way you express yourself is disgusting.
But what’s even worse: it shows you don’t know the facts.
The question is: what are the genetic steps to convert a normal cell into a cancer cell? Or: what causes which “milieu” (= which genes) to weaken (= mutate) and exactly how does this happen: which mutations occur in which genes; what are the functions of these mutations; what are the iterations that occur; when and how do cancer cells acquire additional mutations; what are the pathways in cancer cells resulting in cells even better adapted to growth and survival? This knowledge – which is by no means complete yet – has already led to a number of new cancer treatments called targeted therapies, that have brought about a substantial decline in mortality rates for a number of cancers.
As for
butcherysurgery: when cancer has not metastasized, surgery can bring about a complete cure.Earlier detection (mammograms), together with adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy as well as targeted therapies like aromatose inhibitors and Herceptin) have brought about a decline in mortality rates for breast cancer of about 30%.
The same goes for many other kinds of cancers that have shown a substantial decline in mortality rates thanks to modern science. For example CML, a rare form of leukemia that was always fatal. Thanks to Gleevec, which is also a form of targeted therapy, the number of patients presently alive with CML has dramatically increased right from the start of the first trials in the early 90s. Nowadays patients with CML may expect to survive for at least 30 years after their diagnosis, if not longer.
And these are just a few examples.
Now what is there to look down upon? Would you really rather have all these people die, only to be able to prove you twisted point that conventional cancer therapies are quackery?
In addition to what Beatis already has explained, you should also take a look at the development in survival rates for childhood cancers. Children are not part in screening programs, so what you see is not just a consequence of earlier detection.
Thanks jli. 🙂
You are welcome Beatis 🙂