Recent comments
Recent posts
Psiram/Esowatch
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Respectul Insolence
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Science-Based Medicine
- Fraud, Scientific Rigor, and Alzheimer’s Research August 10, 2022
- TB Or Not TB? Don’t Rely on a Blood Test August 9, 2022
- Conspiracy theories about monkeypox: Déjà vu all over again or same as it ever was? August 8, 2022
Edzard Ernst
- Patient safety at risk in famous UK chiro-school August 10, 2022
- Olivia Newton-John (1948-2022) August 9, 2022
- Poor research endangers public health! Yet another example from the realm of acupuncture August 8, 2022
Blogroll
- A pathologist examines: cancer and fungus
- Alternative Medicine and Cancer
- Ars GeriatriCare (Dutch)
- Cancer Research UK
- Cancer Survival in Europe
- Cryptocheilus medical blog (Dutch)
- Dr. Len's Cancer Blog
- EBM-first: What alternative health practitioners might not tell you
- Medbunker blogspot (Italian)
- My Malignant Melanoma
- Psiram/Esowatch (German)
- Quackwatch
- Science-Based Medicine
Top Posts
Categories
acupuncture
alternative cancer treatment
alternative medicine
antisemitic
baking soda
biologie totale
boosting
breast cancer
cam
Cancer
candida
candida albicans
carcinoma
Caroline Markolin
cat scan
chemo
chemotherapy
chief rabbi
chiropractic
claude sabbah
corinne thos
Dirk Hamer
echinacea
evidence
evidence-based medicine
fungus
garlic
Germanische Neue Medizin
German Medicine
German New Medicine
GNM
götz
Hamer
HBOT
Health fraud
holistic
homeopathy
hoxsey therapy
hulda clarck
images
immune system
iscador
iwan götz
jewish conspiracy
libel
manual therapy
medecine nouvelle
meta medicine
metametrix
metastases
Michaeala Jakubczyk
mistletoe
naturopathy
nouvelle medécine
olivia pilhar
osteopathy
personality
Philosophy of science
positive thinking
psychological aspects and cancer
quackery
rife
Ryke Geerd Hamer
santegod
schneerson
science
Simoncini
sodium bicarbonate
supplements
tony isaacs
total biology
Tullio Simoncini
viscum album
vitamins
zapper
To be more precise he claims only partial regression of the liver lesion and almost complete regression of the pulmonary lesions. But it´s still a good exercise in spotting wrongful (and possibly deceitful) claims. I´m a bit curious to see if any Simoncini proponent will spot the errors.
We stand corrected, thank you!
🙂
Okay since nobody else wants to take a crack at this I will start. And let us disregard that the CAT-scans of the lungs and liver have been switched around.
1) The Pulmonary CAT-scans are taken at different levels.
2) The patient identity of the CAT-scan supposedly showing regression of the pulmonary metastasis is hidden (in contrast to the other scans).
3) There is not a substantial regression of the liver tumor. Maybe this “misunderstanding” comes from the misconception of his that cancers are black on CAT-scans. The darkest area in the centre of the liver tumor is actually necrosis. On the first scan the actual cancer is slightly darker
than the normal liver. Again the scans are not taken at the exact same level.
It would be interesting to know if anybody spotted something else 🙂
Hi jli,
Well… it just seems you’ve got them all, including the fact that the scans have been mixed up, which I think is very sloppy, to say the least.
We’ll give it a few more days, and when no one comes up with anything else, you might just be the winner!
What about the dates on the scans?
In my opinion the dates are meaningless, because we have no way of determining whether the scans are of the same patients. Very clever of you to spot this!
Very well spotted :-). I don´t know if it is common practice to do a CT-scan of the abdomen alone as part of the diagnostic proces. That could explain the different dates on the pretreatment scans.