Anaximperator blog

Blogging against alternative cancer treatments

Continued: Simoncini sCAM Murderer?

Tullio SimonciniTullio Simoncini, a convicted ex medical doctor, ‘discovered’ that cancer is no more than the fungus candida albicans, and claims it can easily be cured with sodium bicarbonate (baking soda). Until now he has failed to deliver any evidence for his ‘discovery.’ 

In November 2008 we posted an email which was sent to Healthfraud, concerning a patient with glioblastoma.

The patient had decided to forgo standard therapy and wanted to seek treatment by Tullio Simoncini instead, which in fact he did.

Sadly,  recently we received information that things did not go well. In the course of  Tullio Simoncini’s treatment with sodium bicarbonate (2nd or 3rd day) the patient developed massive brain hemorrhage and heart attack. Subsequently he was declared brain dead, and life support was removed.

The relatives paid approximately 40.000 $ in cash (28,000 Euros) directly to Tullio Simoncini…

20 responses to “Continued: Simoncini sCAM Murderer?

  1. Keith August 18, 2009 at 7:32 pm

    How very typical, it is so easy to find fault in a man who opposes a system of treatment that seeks to place the worlds most toxic chemicals into the body, that kills thousands of patients every day,that has a success rate of between 3 and 7% within a 5 year period, why 5 years ? because most patients die after that period of time, but are never informed by the Doctors who administer these poisons prior to treament. every day, in every city of the world patients are dying at the hands of Doctors who administer their chemotherapy and radiation therapy, and when that patient dies, (usually from a secondary infection, caused by an immune system that has been destroyed) what is said ? ah well they did their best! but when someone dares to challenge this multi-billion dollar buissiness by applying a substance that is non toxic, natural to the body, effective to the point that it has a 90% success ? then it goes without saying, that person, that system clearly represents a threat. do you have the medical report of the patient that suffered from a brain hemorrhage, do you know what stage his cancer was prior to treatment, can you say without fear of contradiction that the same patient would not have died had he been at home or in a conventional hospital ? I think not. if you study history you will find that anyone who dares to stand up to, and therefore poses a threat to the “establishment” be it the Church, governments, or in this case the drugs industry,are removed. one way or another.It`s about time that some people wake up to the reality, that the drugs industry are there to keep you sick, in fact their financial future depends on it. This week in the UK we have seen a system that allows the introduction of a vaccine by the name of “tamiflu” despite no evidence of it`s safety in treating young children, but was nevertheless “fast tracked” for use in the UK. Whereas in December of this year a large number of essential vitamins and minerals will have their strength reduced to a level that will render them of no use or have any significant benefits, if we take one of these, vitamin C for example, we see that not one person in the entire world has died as a result of taking too high a dose of this vitamin, if this makes sense to you, then I would respectfully request that your monthly visit to you psychiatrist is well overdue! oh! and just as a little foot note do you remember a wonderful little drug by the name of VIOX, this was an anti-inflammatory drug that was sanctioned by the FDA and NICE in the UK, as being perfectly safe to take. and the consequence, it was estimated to have killed at least 65,000 patients, as a direct result of the side effects which caused massive heart attacks in those who were unfortunate enough to trust the drug companies who produced this product, and the system that failed to protect them.

  2. beatis August 18, 2009 at 11:23 pm

    but when someone dares to challenge this multi-billion dollar buissiness by applying a substance that is non toxic, natural to the body, effective to the point that it has a 90% success ?

    Please show us the data for this huge success rate! If you can, that is.🙂

  3. evenarsenicisnatural August 19, 2009 at 5:24 am

    Psst, Keith, chill already.

    Repeating the same old buzzwords and false information in a wall of words is not the way to respond.

    Be a big boy and find out the facts, mkay?

  4. jli August 19, 2009 at 1:52 pm

    @ Keith:
    Try and look beyond your hatred against conventional medicine. You only have to nose around this blog a bit to realize that Simoncini is not what he (and Mercola and others) tries to tell you he is.

    can you say without fear of contradiction that the same patient would not have died had he been at home or in a conventional hospital ?

    He was evidently well enough to travel far to recieve this treatment. Glioblastoma is a serious disease with a poor prognosis. But beyond a reasonable doubt he would have lived longer than he did if he had received no treatment at all. And beyond a reasonable doubt he would have lived longer if he had recieved conventional treatment.

    do you remember a wonderful little drug by the name of VIOX

    And do you remember who took the initiative to get it off the market? Do you honestly believe that alternative practitioners care enough about the efficacy and saftey of their products to monitor effects and side effects of their treatments? Not many people think of this, but the alternatives are operating a multi-billion dollar business (See for instance http://www.nih.gov/news/health/jul2009/nccam-30.htm ), and they seem to have financial interest in keeping bad publicity out of the way.

  5. Joe L'Amarca October 17, 2009 at 7:13 pm

    Health organazations to visit for emergency help
    choose one for help.
    Farma, federal government , Health Insurace or Simoncini .
    Before you choose one , remeber you have cancer and in your death bed . so take a chance and pick the right one for your condation!
    All Public Servants/ Agent cant participate because they would be in conflict with this research and taxpayers would rather hire new ones to save on medical health care plan .
    I will pick Simoncini since that I dont trust this or any of the other liars .

  6. anaximperator October 17, 2009 at 9:06 pm

    You will pick Simoncini because you don’t trust the other liars? How do you know which liar is to be trusted?:mrgreen: Btw: your English is errr… well – never mind.

  7. Nescio November 14, 2009 at 2:55 pm

    Simoncini’s misreading of scientific papers is enough to convince me he is either a fraud or an idiot. Here’s Simoncini’s page with these claims – notice the first study mentioned that he says found Candida in 79% of cancer patients.
    http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/2-candida-cancer-always.html
    Now take a look at the actual paper:
    http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/reprint/12/3/329?view=long&pmid=7012168 which found fungal infections in less than 1%, but 79% were candida. Would you buy a used car from this man, let alone trust him to treat your cancer?
    There’s a new tale circulating of a man cured of prostate cancer and metastases, not by the chemotherapy he was given (not mentioned in most versions of this story), but by the sodium bicarbonate he took for 10 days. Amazing.
    http://www.phkillscancer.com/

  8. beatis November 14, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    We noticed that too. In reality, only 0.99% of the blood samples had fungi, instead of the 79% that Simoncini claims, see this comment: https://anaximperator.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/tullio-simoncini-and-the-research-that-wasnt/#comment-1236

    So this Vernon had chemotherapy??

  9. Nescio November 14, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    He was given chemotherapy in the sense of conventional therapy for prostate cancer – androgen blocking drugs. He says on his website that he was given Finasteride and Casodex, which are used to treat prostate cancer and can be effective at shrinking prostate tumors and bone metastases.

  10. beatis November 14, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    You are right!

    Then why does this man say the baking soda cured him? I’m afraid I’ll never understand what is wrong with these people. This man Vernon seems to suffer from pathological vanity. I find it scary.

  11. beatis November 14, 2009 at 4:46 pm

    Look what it says here: “…Vernon did not undergo any harmful orthodox treatments after he was diagnosed…” http://blog.regardingme.com/bicarbonate-of-soda-used-to-cure-stage-four-prostate-cancer/
    Why do these people lie like that, it’s disgusting!

  12. Nescio November 15, 2009 at 1:02 am

    There’s a similar case here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUx1zh_V9s8 a lady who claims that Simoncini’s bicarbonate treatment cured her breast cancer, I don’t know if you guys are aware of it. She was treated with Arimidex, a conventional treatment for breast cancer which has been proven to shrink some estrogen-sensitive tumors. Her tumor shrank and disappeared, the bicarb did it, of course.

  13. beatis November 15, 2009 at 8:31 am

    Yes, I know this testimonial very well – and the lady too for that matter! When you know her background, the testimonial becomes even more interesting, and even less convincing than it already is. I’ve been thinking of writing a post about it but sometimes the lies make me so sick that I just can’t be bothered. But now that you bring her up… I might just write something about her after all.

    There are also many testimonials in Italian and our Italian blog member WeWee has debunked quite a number of them on his own blog. He has new information on Simoncini and is currently working on a post about it which I will then translate and post here.

  14. Bruce December 16, 2009 at 11:18 am

    This site is actually SCARY and I believe you actually work for pharma and are the liars and deceivers. Lets talk statistics …. no one hardly lives with chemo and the ones that do only do cause of diet change and alternative medicine and die within 5 years. Your site promotes death and nothing natural in your eyes works. Pharma knows it works and wants to synthesize it but really do they want you cured? There is a agenda to control the population and genocide. The cures they have and hold and will not let it out. I have seen patented cures that will NOT be allowed to be used when they do work. There is a bigger picture than what you are stating and it is the NWO elitists who you work for and you don’t even admit it. Nothing natural in your eyes work so I might as well give up but wait I have used clark’s trreatments with success and others have to. Frined is clear 15 years of incurable and advanced esophogus cancer. Doctors watched the treatments and were amazed. So stop your crap. Not everything works for everyone and with pharma medicine the statistics show less success compared to natural cures. My friend with an ozonator, he drank homozone and took pysillium husks and changed PH and his colon cancer gone for over 10 years. Doctors asked what he did. I helped a person with Lupus and it is gone. SO STOP your BULL CRAP and dissention and grow up you quacks. Did you know how the word quack came about.

    Hey I bet the rife technology was wrong to it did cure all cancer and WAS PROVEN. Read the history on that. Again grow up and stop defaming truth that helps more than hurts. Nothing is perfect espceially your comments and unfounded and childish opinions. I m sorry I came to this site as it really is stupid and seems to be a bashing site. I see nothing stated nor positive nor DO YOU OFFER ANY REALITY TO ANY CURE!!!!!!!! This is a quack site with a couple of quack commentators called BEATIS and so forth. Please don’t Beat us anymore with your lies and nonsense and stay off other sites where people are getting results. People like you will hve your karma and death too OK!

  15. anaximperator December 16, 2009 at 4:14 pm

    Sure. Whatever.:mrgreen:

  16. Nescio December 16, 2009 at 5:10 pm

    Bruce, for a look at alternative treatments for cancer and their relative success based on stats provided by alternative practitioners themselves, you might look here:
    http://www.users.on.net/~pmoran/cancer/Alternative_studies.htm Not too impressive I’m afraid, though I truly wish it was otherwise.
    This page is also worth reading, if you are really interested in ‘the truth’ about alternative cancer treatments: http://www.users.on.net/~pmoran/cancer/Showing_it_works_1.htm
    In my opinion Simoncini is either an idiot or a fraud or possibly both – some bad karma coming his way for sure if there is such a thing.

  17. evenarsenicisnatural December 17, 2009 at 1:37 am

    Bruce:

    Where’s your cure? Aww, can’t find it can you?

    Cut the RANDOM capitalization and same-old false garbage being BABBLED and maybe someone might gently pat you on the head instead of LAUGHING in your face and shoving your ass back to you.

    BTW – go away

  18. Nescio December 17, 2009 at 2:20 am

    Why are so many people so distrustful of conventional medicine, especially when it comes to cancer? This truly puzzles me.
    I worked with people doing research into cancer, at the Medical Research Council in the UK, for 7 years and worked with doctors treating patients with cancer. These were people who did independent research and also worked with pharmaceutical companies developing drugs, analytical kits etc. and saw people with cancer on a daily basis. I partied with them, got drunk with them, smoked dope with them, but none of them ever told me that their research had been suppressed or influenced by ‘Big Pharma’ in any way, and I asked, believe me.
    I have seen several friends and family cured of cancer using conventional therapies, some are alive and well more than 20 years later. So I find it hard to believe the wild conspiracy theories that Bruce and his ilk bring to the table.
    By the way Bruce, if you are still lurking, the word “quack” has nothing to do with mercury in amalgam teeth fillings. That’s a myth, like a lot of what is circulated on the internet about cancer and health.

  19. Anthony October 24, 2010 at 5:01 am

    Plesase read about chemo and about the sponsers of this industry blog here: http://www.ouralexander.org/

    Shame on this site for not teaching of the history of chemo and the billions of profits of the otherwise wothless chemicals that have a documented 2% success in 5 year survival, well below placebo.
    Beatis should disclose his name and location for family members of tortured to death for profit chemo victims can no longer hide himself and his sponsors

  20. wilmamazone October 24, 2010 at 5:53 am

    Shame on this site for not teaching of the history of chemo and the billions of profits of the otherwise wothless chemicals that have a documented 2% success in 5 year survival, well below placebo.

    Shame on you that you want us to swallow that urban legend again.
    September 2, 2009:
    https://anaximperator.wordpress.com/2009/09/02/only-3-percent-survive-chemotherapy/
    Is It True That Only 2 Or 3 % Of Cancer Patients Survive Chemotherapy?

    on the end:

    So… now what?
    The data from the study are from 1998. We are now in 2009 and progress has been made in those years. There is better medication to diminish side effects of chemotherapy. There is new, sophisticated technology to assess which breast cancers are prone to metastasize and which are not, resulting in less women having to undergo chemotherapy. Scientists are working hard on similar tests for other cancers.

    There are over 80 different kinds of chemotherapy. Some are sheer hell, but many are quite doable, including the one I had. Nevertheless: chemotherapy still is the ultimate cancer scare factor and the sooner we can do without it, the better. But it is not true that only 2-3% survive chemotherapy. It is not true that the average benefit of chemotherapy to 5-year survival is as low as 2%. And it is also not true that all chemotherapy is by definition completely and totally unbearable.

    If we really want to get anywhere at all, then honesty about the facts, not manipulation, self-aggrandizing and scare mongering, should be the basis for discussion and decision making.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: